Advertisement
Clinical Short Communication| Volume 388, P128-132, May 15, 2018

Download started.

Ok

Predictors of cognitive impairment in multiple system atrophy

Published:March 10, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2018.03.017

      Highlights

      • We investigated clinical and radiological findings in MSA patients.
      • MMSE score correlates with disease duration, global disability, and dysautonomia.
      • FAB score correlates with motor function and cerebral white matter lesions.
      • Residual urine volume correlates with rapidly progressive cognitive impairment.

      Abstract

      Objective

      To determine predictors of cognitive impairment and frontal dysfunction in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA).

      Methods

      We recruited 59 patients with MSA and determined the predictors of a decline in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) scores.

      Results

      The MMSE scores negatively correlated with disease duration, Unified MSA Rating Scale (UMSARS) part 1 and 4 scores, and residual urine volume, and positively correlated with the coefficient of variation of electrocardiographic RR intervals. The FAB scores negatively correlated with the UMSARS part 2 score, periventricular hyperintensity grade, and deep white matter hyperintense signal grade. A significant predictor of rapidly progressive cognitive impairment was a high residual urine volume.

      Conclusions

      Impairment of global cognitive function correlates with the long-term disease duration, global disability due to the disease, and autonomic dysfunction, whereas frontal dysfunction correlates with motor function and degeneration of cerebral white matter.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the Neurological Sciences
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      Reference

        • Stankovic I.
        • Krismer F.
        • Jesic A.
        • et al.
        Cognitive impairment in multiple system atrophy: a position statement by the neuropsychology task force of MDS multiple system atrophy (MODIMSA) study group.
        Mov. Disord. 2014; 29: 857-867
        • Chang C.C.
        • Chang Y.Y.
        • Chang W.N.
        • et al.
        Cognitive deficits in multiple system atrophy correlate with frontal atrophy and disease duration.
        Eur. J. Neurol. 2009; 16: 1144-1150
        • Kawamura K.
        • Shimohata T.
        • Nakayama H.
        • Tomita M.
        • Ozawa T.
        • Nishizawa M.
        Factors influencing the cognitive function in patients with multiple system atrophy.
        Mov. Disord. 2010; 25: 2891-2892
        • Konagaya M.
        • Sakai M.
        • Matsuoka Y.
        • Konagaya Y.
        • Hashizume Y.
        Multiple system atrophy with remarkable frontal lobe atrophy.
        Acta Neuropathol. 1999; 97: 423-428
        • Kitayama M.
        • Wada-Isoe K.
        • Irizawa Y.
        • Nakashima K.
        Assessment of dementia in patients with multiple system atrophy.
        Eur. J. Neurol. 2009; 16: 589-594
        • Koga S.
        • Parks A.
        • Uitti R.J.
        • et al.
        Profile of cognitive impairment and underlying pathology in multiple system atrophy.
        Mov. Disord. 2017; 32: 405-413
        • Gilman S.
        • Wenning G.K.
        • Low P.A.
        • et al.
        Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy.
        Neurology. 2008; 71: 670-676
        • Wenning G.K.
        • Tison F.
        • Seppi K.
        • et al.
        Development and validation of the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS).
        Mov. Disord. 2004; 19: 1391-1402
        • Fazekas S.
        • Chawluk J.B.
        • Alavi A.
        • Hurting A.I.
        • Zimmerman R.A.
        MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging.
        AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1987; 8: 421-426
        • Yabe I.
        • Soma H.
        • Takei A.
        • Fujiki N.
        • Yanagihara T.
        • Sasaki H.
        MSA-C is the predominant clinical phenotype of MSA in Japan: analysis of 142 patients with probable MSA.
        J. Neurol. Sci. 2006; 249: 115-121
        • Brown R.G.
        • Lacomblez L.
        • Landwehrmeyer B.G.
        • et al.
        Cognitive impairment in patients with multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy.
        Brain. 2010; 133: 2382-2393
        • Koziol L.F.
        • Budding D.
        • Andreasen N.
        • et al.
        Consensus paper: the cerebellum's role in movement and cognition.
        Cerebellum. 2014; 13: 151-177
        • Oguro H.
        • Yamaguchi S.
        • Abe S.
        • Ishida Y.
        • Bokura H.
        • Kobayashi S.
        Differentiating Alzheimer's disease from subcortical vascular dementia with the FAB test.
        J. Neurol. 2006; 253: 1490-1494
        • Ito T.
        • Sakakibara R.
        • Yasuda K.
        • et al.
        Incomplete emptying and urinary retention in multiple-system atrophy: when does it occur and how do we manage it?.
        Mov. Disord. 2006; 21: 816-823
        • Coon E.A.
        • Sletten D.M.
        • Mandrekar J.N.
        • et al.
        Clinical features and autonomic testing predict survival in multiple system atrophy.
        Brain. 2015; 138: 3623-3631
        • Wenning G.K.
        • Geser F.
        • Krismer F.
        • et al.
        The natural history of multiple system atrophy: a prospective European cohort study.
        Lancet Neurol. 2013; 12: 264-274