Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 345, ISSUE 1-2, P159-163, October 15, 2014

Download started.

Ok

Novel characterization of gait impairments in people with multiple sclerosis by means of the gait profile score

      Highlights

      • We analyzed gait kinematics in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).
      • The index gait profile score (GPS) was calculated from gait analysis data.
      • People with MS exhibit significantly higher GPS values than healthy controls.
      • GPS can be used to define deviations from physiologic gait in people with MS.

      Abstract

      The assessment of gait abnormalities in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) represents a key factor in evaluating the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatments. Despite the availability of sophisticated equipment to objectively evaluate the kinematic aspects of gait, there are still some difficulties in processing the large and complex amount of data they produce in the daily clinical routine. On the basis of the above-mentioned considerations we propose a novel characterization of gait kinematics in individuals with MS, based on a single measure (gait profile score, GPS) obtained from a quantitative three-dimensional analysis of gait performed using an opto-electronic system. We also investigated the correlation between GPS and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) values. Thirty-four patients suffering from relapsing–remitting MS (13 female, 21 male, mean age 46.7 years) with an EDSS score of ≤6 underwent a gait analysis from which the GPS index was calculated. Their results were compared with those of a control group of healthy age- and gender-matched subjects. The GPS of individuals with MS was found significantly higher with respect to controls (9.12° vs. 5.67°, p < 0.001) as the result of kinematic differences in gait patterns referring to pelvic tilt and rotation, hip flexion–extension and rotation, knee flexion–extension and ankle dorsi- and plantar-flexion. A moderate correlation was also found between the EDSS score of the participants and their GPS values (r = 0.63, p < 0.001). The GPS index thus appears suitable to represent gait deviations from physiological patterns in individuals affected by MS and potentially useful in assessing the outcomes related both to rehabilitation programs and pharmacologic/physical therapies.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the Neurological Sciences
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Cameron M.H.
        • Wagner J.M.
        Gait abnormalities in multiple sclerosis: pathogenesis, evaluation, and advances in treatment.
        Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2011; 11: 507-515
        • Minden S.L.
        • Frankel D.
        • Hadden L.
        • Perloffp J.
        • Srinath K.P.
        • Hoaglin D.C.
        The Sonya Slifka Longitudinal Multiple Sclerosis Study: methods and sample characteristics.
        Mult Scler. 2006; 12: 24-38
        • Iezzoni L.I.
        • Rao S.R.
        • Kinkel R.P.
        Patterns of mobility aid use among working-age persons with multiple sclerosis living in the community in the United States.
        Disabil Health J. 2009; 2: 67-76
        • Beer S.
        • Khan F.
        • Kesselring J.
        Rehabilitation interventions in multiple sclerosis: an overview.
        J Neurol. 2012; 259: 1994-2008
        • Pearson O.R.
        • Busse M.E.
        • van Deursen R.W.
        • Wiles C.M.
        Quantification of walking mobility in neurological disorders.
        QJM. 2004; 97: 463-475
        • Coulthard-Morris L.
        Clinical and rehabilitation outcome measures.
        in: Burks J.S. Johnson K.P. Multiple sclerosis: diagnosis, medical management, and rehabilitation. Demos Medical Publishing, Inc., New York, NY2000: 221-290
        • Martin C.L.
        • Phillips B.A.
        • Kilpatrick T.J.
        • Butzkueven H.
        • Tubridy N.
        • McDonald E.
        • et al.
        Gait and balance impairment in early multiple sclerosis in the absence of clinical disability.
        Mult Scler. 2006; 12: 620-628
        • Givon U.
        • Zeilig G.
        • Achiron A.
        Gait analysis in multiple sclerosis: characterization of temporal–spatial parameters using GAITRite functional ambulation system.
        Gait Posture. 2009; 29: 138-142
        • Sosnoff J.J.
        • Weikert M.
        • Dlugonski D.
        • Smith D.C.
        • Motl R.W.
        Quantifying gait impairment in multiple sclerosis using GAITRite technology.
        Gait Posture. 2011; 34: 145-147
        • Sandroff B.M.
        • Sosnoff J.J.
        • Motl R.W.
        Physical fitness, walking performance, and gait in multiple sclerosis.
        J Neurol Sci. 2013; 328: 70-76
        • Socie M.J.
        • Sosnoff J.J.
        Gait variability and multiple sclerosis.
        Mult Scler Int. 2013; 2013: 645197
        • Motl R.W.
        • Weikert M.
        • Suh Y.
        • Sosnoff J.J.
        • Pula J.
        • Soaz C.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of the actibelt(®) accelerometer for measuring walking speed in a controlled environment among persons with multiple sclerosis.
        Gait Posture. 2012; 35: 192-196
        • Huisinga J.M.
        • Mancini M.
        • St George R.J.
        • Horak F.B.
        Accelerometry reveals differences in gait variability between patients with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls.
        Ann Biomed Eng. 2013; 41: 1670-1679
        • Benedetti M.G.
        • Piperno R.
        • Simoncini L.
        • Bonato P.
        • Tonini A.
        • Giannini S.
        Gait abnormalities in minimally impaired multiple sclerosis patients.
        Mult Scler. 1999; 5: 363-368
        • Crenshaw S.J.
        • Royer T.D.
        • Richards J.G.
        • Hudson D.J.
        Gait variability in people with multiple sclerosis.
        Mult Scler. 2006; 12: 613-619
        • Kelleher K.J.
        • Spence W.
        • Solomonidis S.
        • Apatsidis D.
        The characterisation of gait patterns of people with multiple sclerosis.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2010; 32: 1242-1250
        • Nogueira L.A.
        • Teixeira L.
        • Sabino P.
        • Filho H.A.
        • Alvarenga R.M.
        • Thuler L.C.
        Gait characteristics of multiple sclerosis patients in the absence of clinical disability.
        Disabil Rehabil. 2013; 35: 1472-1478
        • Huisinga J.M.
        • Schmid K.K.
        • Filipi M.L.
        • Stergiou N.
        Gait mechanics are different between healthy controls and patients with multiple sclerosis.
        J Appl Biomech. 2013; 29: 303-311
        • Scott S.M.
        • van der Linden M.L.
        • Hooper J.E.
        • Cowan P.
        • Mercer T.H.
        Quantification of gait kinematics and walking ability of people with multiple sclerosis who are new users of functional electrical stimulation.
        J Rehabil Med. 2013; 45: 364-369
        • Cimolin V.
        • Galli M.
        Summary measures for clinical gait analysis: a literature review.
        Gait Posture. 2014; 39 ([Epub ahead of print]): 1005-1010https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.02.001
        • Baker R.
        • McGinley J.L.
        • Schwartz M.H.
        • Beynon S.
        • Rozumalski A.
        • Graham H.K.
        • et al.
        The gait profile score and movement analysis profile.
        Gait Posture. 2009; 30: 265-269
        • Celletti C.
        • Galli M.
        • Cimolin V.
        • Castori M.
        • Tenore N.
        • Albertini G.
        • et al.
        Use of the gait profile score for the evaluation of patients with joint hypermobility syndrome/Ehlers–Danlos syndrome hypermobility type.
        Res Dev Disabil. 2013; 34: 4280-4285
        • Schweizer K.
        • Romkes J.
        • Coslovsky M.
        • Brunner R.
        The influence of muscle strength on the gait profile score (GPS) across different patients.
        Gait Posture. 2014; 39: 80-85
        • Beynon S.
        • McGinley J.L.
        • Dobson F.
        • Baker R.
        Correlations of the gait profile score and the movement analysis profile relative to clinical judgments.
        Gait Posture. 2010; 32: 129-132
        • Polman C.H.
        • Reingold S.C.
        • Edan G.
        • Filippi M.
        • Hartung H.P.
        • Kappos L.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”.
        Ann Neurol. 2005; 58: 840-846
        • Davis R.B.
        • Õunpuu S.
        • Tyburski D.
        • Gage J.R.
        A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique.
        Hum Mov Sci. 1991; 10: 575-587
        • Schwartz M.H.
        • Rozumalski A.
        The gait deviation index: a new comprehensive index of gait pathology.
        Gait Posture. 2008; 28: 351-357
        • Rodgers M.M.
        • Mulcare J.A.
        • King D.L.
        • Mathews T.
        • Gupta S.C.
        • Glaser R.M.
        Gait characteristics of individuals with multiple sclerosis before and after a 6-month aerobic training program.
        J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999; 36: 183-188
        • Frohman T.C.
        • Castro W.
        • Shah A.
        • Courtney A.
        • Ortstadt J.
        • Davis S.L.
        • et al.
        Symptomatic therapy in multiple sclerosis.
        Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2011; 4: 83-98
        • Broekmans T.
        • Gijbels D.
        • Eijnde B.O.
        • Alders G.
        • Lamers I.
        • Roelants M.
        • et al.
        The relationship between upper leg muscle strength and walking capacity in persons with multiple sclerosis.
        Mult Scler. 2013; 19: 112-119
        • Byrne C.A.
        • O'Keeffe D.T.
        • Donnelly A.E.
        • Lyons G.M.
        Effect of walking speed changes on tibialis anterior EMG during healthy gait for FES envelope design in drop foot correction.
        J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2007; 17: 605-616
        • Baker R.
        • McGinley J.L.
        • Schwartz M.
        • Thomason P.
        • Rodda J.
        • Graham H.K.
        The minimal clinically important difference for the gait profile score.
        Gait Posture. 2012; 35: 612-615
        • Kirtley C.
        • Whittle M.W.
        • Jefferson R.J.
        Influence of walking speed on gait parameters.
        J Biomed Eng. 1985; 7: 282-288
        • Lelas J.L.
        • Merriman G.J.
        • Riley P.O.
        • Kerrigan D.C.
        Predicting peak kinematic and kinetic parameters from gait speed.
        Gait Posture. 2003; 17: 106-112