Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 306, ISSUE 1-2, P42-48, July 15, 2011

Electrophysiological findings in neurofibromatosis type 1

Published:April 19, 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2011.03.048

      Abstract

      Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a common, autosomal dominant neurocutaneous disorder in which any organ system, including the skin, skeleton and nervous system can be affected. In this study, we compared the electrophysiological and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with NF1. Thirty-nine adolescent and adult patients (23 women and 16 men) diagnosed with NF1 with a mean age of 25.8±10 years (10–56) were included in this study. We collected data in the form of the results of neurological examinations, multimodal evoked potentials (EPs; brainstem auditory evoked potentials, BAEPs; somatosensory evoked potentials, SEPs; and visual evoked potentials, VEPs), cerebral/orbital/spinal MRIs, and electroneuromyography (ENMG). Twenty (51.3%) patients showed abnormal VEPs, 14 (35.9%) showed abnormal SEPs, and six (15.4%) showed abnormal BAEPs. All evoked potentials were abnormal in four (10.3%) cases. These electrophysiological findings occurred primarily in the absence of any clinical sign related to the affected system. MRI revealed pathologic findings in 26 of 39 patients, and these were not always correlated with visual, auditory, or somatosensory pathway abnormalities. ENMG showed polyneuropathy in two of 33 patients who underwent ENMG. Our study showed that MRI and electrophysiological abnormalities may be found in most patients with NF1, even in the absence of associated clinical symptoms or signs. Electrophysiological testing is helpful for monitoring the subclinical involvement of the central and peripheral nervous systems in patients with NF1.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of the Neurological Sciences
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • North K.
        • Cochineas C.
        • Tang E.
        • Fagan E.
        Optic gliomas in neurofibromatosis type 1: role of visual evoked potentials.
        Pediatr Neurol. 1994; 10: 117-123
        • Friedman J.M.
        Neurofibromatosis 1: clinical manifestations and diagnostic criteria.
        J Child Neurol. 2002; 17: 548-554
        • Lynch T.M.
        • Gutmann D.H.
        Neurofibromatosis 1.
        Neurol Clin. 2002; 20: 841-865
        • Ferner R.E.
        • Hughes R.A.
        • Hall S.M.
        • Upadhyaya M.
        • Johnson M.R.
        Neurofibromatous neuropathy in neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1).
        J Med Genet. 2004; 41: 837-841
        • Ammendola A.
        • Ciccone G.
        • Ammendola E.
        Utility of multimodal evoked potentials study in neurofibromatosis type 1 of childhood.
        Pediatr Neurol. 2006; 34: 276-280
        • Margari L.
        • Presicci A.
        • Ventura P.
        • Maria Bacca S.
        • Iliceto G.
        • Medicamento N.
        • et al.
        Clinical and Instrumental (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and multimodal evoked potentials) follow-up of brain lesions in three young patients with neurofibromatosis 1.
        J Child Neurol. 2006; 21: 1085-1090
        • Drouet A.
        • Wolkenstein P.
        • Lefaucheur J.P.
        • Pinson S.
        • Combemale P.
        • Gherardi R.K.
        • et al.
        Neurofibromatosis 1-associated neuropathies: a reappraisal.
        Brain. 2004; 127: 1993-2009
      1. Neurofibromatosis: Conference statement. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference.
        Arch Neurol. 1988; 45: 575-578
        • Schiff J.A.
        • Cracco P.Q.
        • Cracco J.B.
        Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in Guillain–Barré syndrome.
        Neurology. 1985; 35: 771-773
        • Cracco R.Q.
        • Cracco J.B.
        Somatosensory evoked potential in man: far field potentials.
        Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1976; 41: 460-466
        • Cracco R.Q.
        • Cracco J.B.
        Visual evoked potentials in man: early oscillatory potentials.
        Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1978; 45: 731-739
        • Iannaccone A.
        • McCluney R.A.
        • Brewer V.R.
        • Spiegel P.H.
        • Taylor J.S.
        • Kerr N.C.
        • et al.
        Visual evoked potentials in children with neurofibromatosis type 1.
        Doc Ophthalmol. 2002; 105: 63-81
        • Wolsey D.H.
        • Larson S.A.
        • Creel D.
        • Hoffman R.
        Can screening for optic nerve gliomas in patients with neurofibromatosis type I be performed with visual-evoked potential testing?.
        JAAPOS. 2006; 10: 307-311
        • Duffner P.K.
        • Cohen M.E.
        • Seidel F.G.
        • Shucard D.W.
        The significance of MRI abnormalities in children with neurofibromatosis.
        Neurology. 1989; 39: 373-378
        • Ko K.F.
        The role of evoked potential and MR imaging in assessing multiple sclerosis: a comparative study.
        Singapore Med J. 2010; 51: 716-720
        • Rizzo P.A.
        • Valle E.
        • Mollica M.A.
        • Sanarelli L.
        • Pozzessere G.
        Multimodal evoked potentials in neuro-Behçet: a longitudinal study of two cases.
        Acta Neurol Scand. 1989; 79: 18-22
        • DeBella K.
        • Poskitt K.
        • Szudek J.
        • Friedman J.M.
        Use of “unidentified bright objects” on MRI for diagnosis of neurofibromatosis 1 in children.
        Neurology. 2000; 54: 1646-1651
        • Ferner R.E.
        • Chaudhuri R.
        • Bingham J.
        • Cox T.
        • Hughes R.A.
        MRI in neurofibromatosis 1. The nature and evolution of increased intensity T2 weighted lesions and their relationship to intellectual impairment.
        J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993; 56: 492-495
        • Aoki S.
        • Barkovich A.J.
        • Nishimura K.
        • Kjos B.O.
        • Machida T.
        • Cogen P.
        • et al.
        Neurofibromatosis types 1 and 2: cranial MR findings.
        Radiology. 1989; 172: 527-534
        • Roos K.L.
        • Pascuzzi R.M.
        • Dunn D.W.
        Neurofibromatosis, Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease, or both?.
        Neurofibromatosis. 1989; 2: 238-243
        • Lupski J.R.
        • Pentao L.
        • Williams L.L.
        • Patel P.I.
        Stable inheritance of the CMT1A DNA duplication in two patients with CMT1 and NF1.
        Am J Med Genet. 1993; 45: 92-96
        • Koc F.
        • Guzal A.İ.
        Neurofibromatosis type 1 associated with Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 1A.
        J Dermatol. 2009; 36: 306-311
        • Tedesco M.A.
        • Di Salvo G.
        • Natale F.
        • Pergola V.
        • Calabrese E.
        • Grassia C.
        • et al.
        The heart in neurofibromatosis type 1: an echocardiographic study.
        Am Heart J. 2002; 143: 883-888
        • Zacharia T.T.
        • Jaramillo D.
        • Poussaint T.Y.
        • Korf B.
        MR imaging of abdominopelvic involvement in neurofibromatosis type 1: a review of 43 patients.
        Pediatr Radiol. 2005; 35: 317-322