Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Volume 313, Issue 1 , Pages 22-26, 15 February 2012

Cilostazol combined with aspirin prevents early neurological deterioration in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A pilot study

  • Tomomi Nakamura

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
    • Itabashi Chuo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan. Tel.: +81 3 3353 8111; fax: +81 3 5269 7324.
  • ,
  • Shinji Tsuruta

      Affiliations

    • Itabashi Chuo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Shinichiro Uchiyama

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Received 2 July 2011; received in revised form 24 September 2011; accepted 28 September 2011. published online 20 October 2011.

Abstract 

Recent randomized trials have shown that cilostazol is superior to aspirin for secondary stroke prevention. We hypothesized that combining cilostazol with aspirin is more effective than aspirin alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke. This randomized study compared the effects of oral aspirin alone to aspirin plus cilostazol in patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke within 48h of stroke onset. NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were checked before and after 14days and 6months of drug administration. The primary and secondary endpoints were neurological deterioration or stroke recurrence (NIHSS score1) within 14days and 6months, respectively. For statistical analysis, on-treatment analysis was conducted. Seventy-six patients were enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint was significantly higher in the aspirin group than in the aspirin plus cilostazol group (28% vs. 6%, relative risk (RR): 0.21, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.05–0.87, p=0.013). Among the patients who did not reach these endpoints, the mean improvement in the NIHSS score at day 14 tended to be better (−1.8±1.2 vs. −1.2±1.0, p=0.078) and the frequency of the favorable functional status of mRS 0–1 at month 6 was significantly higher (RR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.07–2.06, p=0.0048) in the aspirin plus cilostazol group than in the aspirin group. Patients treated with aspirin plus cilostazol during the acute phase of stroke had less neurological deterioration and more favorable functional status than those treated with aspirin alone.

Keywords: Cilostazol, Aspirin, Acute ischemic stroke, Stroke prevention

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0022-510X(11)00600-9

doi:10.1016/j.jns.2011.09.038

Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Volume 313, Issue 1 , Pages 22-26, 15 February 2012